Well, here is one....it was quite easy to find:
"Article 2, Section 26. Bearing arms
Section 26. The right of the individual citizen to bear arms in defense of himself or the state shall not be impaired, but nothing in this section shall be construed as authorizing individuals or corporations to organize, maintain, or employ an armed body of men. "
Don't paint all of us with the same broad brush. I am one of those in here who states up front that the Second Amendment does not apply to the states (per Cruikshank) and has not (yet) been incorporated to do by the USSC.
Then you shouldn't be arguing with me when I say the same thing. ;)
Depending on the situation and the law being violated.
It does have protection from infringement by the federal government, however. The fact that we have not had a real poster child to go the USSC does not make so it doesn't exist.
BTW, that time may come for the USSC to take a look at it since there is a difference in definition between circuit courts.
Have not said different although there are some restriction on that also. The USSC said in Presser that the states can limit the right to keep and bear arms as long as an effective state militia is maintained. It also held that *all* citizens capable of bearing arms make up that reserve militia and that the states cannot *prohibit* people from keeping and bearing arms "....so as to deprive the United States of their rightful resource for maintaining public security."
-- Sleep well tonight.........RD (The Sandman)
School - Four walls with tomorrow inside.
"The bane attraction of government is that it allows busybodies to impose decisions on others without paying any price themselves."
"It is hard to imagine a more stupid or more dangerous way of making decisions than by putting those decisions in the hands of people who